4.8 Article

Z-scheme photocatalyst Pt/GaP-TiO2-SiO2:Rh for the separated H2 evolution from photocatalytic seawater splitting

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 296, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120339

关键词

Photocatalytic seawater splitting; Gallium phosphide; Heterojunction nanocomposite; Z-scheme photocatalyst; H-2 and O-2 separation

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), Taiwan [MOST 1082221E002111MY3]
  2. Academia Sinica of Taiwan [ASKPQ106DDPP]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrated the high photoactivity of the Z-scheme photocatalyst PGTSR for splitting pure water and artificial seawater, achieving significant hydrogen/oxygen evolution rates without sacrificial agents under simulated sunlight. The separated H-2 evolution from O-2 through the photocatalytic artificial seawater splitting in a twin photoreactor also showed promising results.
Heterojunction Pt/GaP-TiO2-SiO2:Rh (PGTSR) photocatalyst with the uniform spherical morphology (20 nm) possessed the high Ti3+ defects and oxygen vacancy (VO) sites in TiO2-SiO2:Rh composite which intimately contacted with GaP to form a Z-scheme photocatalyst. The PGTSR exhibited high photoactivity for pure water and artificial seawater splitting without sacrificial agents in single reactor under 4 -h simulated sunlight irradiation. The hydrogen/oxygen evolution rates (HER/OER) reached 80.1/41.2 mu mol.g(-1) and 94.0/45.1 mu mol.g(-1) in pure and artificial seawater splitting, respectively. The separated H-2 evolution from O-2 through the photocatalytic artificial seawater splitting was also carried out in a twin photoreactor, which was divided by a Neosepta membrane with IO3-/I- shuttle mediator and used commercial WO3 as O-2-photocatalyst, was achieved with HER/OER of 41.5/26.1 mu mol.g(-1) after 4 -h simulated sunlight irradiation. This work demonstrated a new construct of Z-scheme photocatalyst as well as the improvement of artificial photosynthesis system for overall photocatalytic seawater splitting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据