4.4 Article

Cisplatin-based Electrochemotherapy Significantly Downregulates Key Heat Shock Proteins in MDA-MB-231-Human Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells

期刊

APPLIED BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 194, 期 1, 页码 517-528

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12010-021-03703-9

关键词

Heat shock proteins; HSP90; HSP70; Triple-negative breast cancer; Proteomics; MDA-MB-231 cells

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heat shock proteins (HSPs) are essential for the survival of all organisms under high temperature stresses, protecting cells against various stresses including thermal, chemical, physical, and others. In cancer treatment, some HSPs can be modulated to induce apoptotic cell death, potentially offering effective therapeutic strategies.
Heat shock proteins (HSPs) are available and/or induced for the survival of all organisms, including eukaryotic, prokaryotic, and plants, from higher temperature stresses. They are the chaperone proteins that protect all cells against heat, as the name implies. In addition to thermal stress, they also protect them from chemical, physical, and other stresses, including exposure to oxidative stress, nutritional deficiencies, ultraviolet radiation, ethanol, viral infection, ischemia-reperfusion injury, and cancer-related stresses. They are classified based on their molecular weights in kDa, such as HSP90 and HSP70. In our label-free, high-throughput, quantitative LC-MS/MS-based proteomic studies of MDA-MB-231, human, triple-negative breast cancer cells, treated with electrical pulses (EP) and cisplatin (CsP), we identified a number of HSPs, such as HSP90AA1, and others to be significantly downregulated in EP + CsP, compared to CsP alone. This indicates that cells will undergo apoptotic cell death and hence could cause effective cancer cure/treatment. Considering that over 2 million new cases and over 600,000 deaths in 2020, of which similar to 15% are TNBC, heat shock proteins could be the untapped resources, available for the next biomarkers and/or inhibitors for new/additional therapies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据