4.4 Article

Newly Synthesized Benzimidazoles Inhibit Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Matrix Metalloproteinase-2 and-9 Levels in Prostate Cancer Cells

期刊

ANTI-CANCER AGENTS IN MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 22, 期 11, 页码 2109-2115

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/1871520621666210924114856

关键词

Benzimidazole; angiogenesis; VEGF; MMP-2; MMP-9; prostate cancer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, novel benzimidazole derivatives were synthesized and their cytotoxic and anti-angiogenic effects on prostate cancer cells and umbilical vein endothelial cells were investigated. The compound G1 exhibited potent cytotoxic activity on both types of cells and inhibited cell migration by decreasing the expression of key angiogenesis-related molecules such as VEGF, MMP-2, and MMP-9.
Background: Investigating the effects of newly synthesized agents on various molecular mechanisms to understand their mechanism of action is an important step of pre-clinical screening. Benzimidazoles are composed of a unique fused benzene and imidazole ring and have attracted great attention due to their broad bioactivities, including antitumor. Objective: In the current study, we reported the synthesis of novel benzimidazole derivatives and investigated the possible cytotoxic and anti-angiogenic effects on human prostate cancer and umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). Methods: MTT assay was used to assess cell viability. A scratch assay was conducted to monitor the migration of cells. mRNA expression levels of VEGF, MMP-2, and MMP-9 were evaluated using qPCR. Changes in protein levels were evaluated by western blotting. Results: Compound G1, having a chlorine moiety, showed a potent cytotoxic activity on both prostate cancer cells and HUVECs, and inhibited cell migration via decreasing the mRNA and protein levels of key angiogenesis-related molecules such as VEGF, MMP-2, and MMP-9. Conclusion: These results suggest that newly synthesized G1 may be a novel anti-angiogenic agent for prostate cancer treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据