相关参考文献
注意：仅列出部分参考文献，下载原文获取全部文献信息。The Goldilocks Zone: (Too) Many Confidence Intervals In Tests of Mediation Just Exclude Zero
Martin Gotz et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN (2021)
Analytic reproducibility in articles receiving open data badges at the journal Psychological Science: an observational study
Tom E. Hardwicke et al.
ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE (2021)
Initial evidence of research quality of registered reports compared with the standard publishing model
Courtney K. Soderberg et al.
NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR (2021)
A Multi-Site Collaborative Study of the Hostile Priming Effect
Randy McCarthy et al.
COLLABRA-PSYCHOLOGY (2021)
A Multilab Replication of the Ego Depletion Effect
Junhua Dang et al.
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PERSONALITY SCIENCE (2021)
Science is not a signal detection problem
Brent M. Wilson et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2020)
Crowdsourcing Hypothesis Tests: Making Transparent How Design Choices Shape Research Results
Justin F. Landy et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN (2020)
Research Culture and Reproducibility
Marcus R. Munafo et al.
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES (2020)
Low replicability can support robust and efficient science
Stephan Lewandowsky et al.
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS (2020)
Probabilistic forecasting of replication studies
Samuel Pawel et al.
PLOS ONE (2020)
Reproducibility of individual effect sizes in meta-analyses in psychology
Esther Maassen et al.
PLOS ONE (2020)
Adversarial alignment enables competing models to engage in cooperative theory building toward cumulative science
Naomi Ellemers et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2020)
Estimating the deep replicability of scientific findings using human and artificial intelligence
Yang Yang et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2020)
New statistical metrics for multisite replication projects
Maya B. Mathur et al.
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY (2020)
What is replication?
Brian A. Nosek et al.
PLOS BIOLOGY (2020)
Variability in the analysis of a single neuroimaging dataset by many teams
Rotem Botvinik-Nezer et al.
NATURE (2020)
What Is a Replication?
Edouard Machery
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE (2020)
Are replication rates the same across academic fields? Community forecasts from the DARPA SCORE programme
Michael Gordon et al.
ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE (2020)
Specification curve analysis
Uri Simonsohn et al.
NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR (2020)
Argue about what a replication means before you do it
Brian A. Nosek et al.
NATURE (2020)
Heterogeneity in Direct Replications in Psychology and Its Association With Effect Size
Anton Olsson-Collentine et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN (2020)
Building a Collaborative Psychological Science: Lessons Learned From ManyBabies 1
Krista Byers-Heinlein et al.
CANADIAN PSYCHOLOGY-PSYCHOLOGIE CANADIENNE (2020)
Laypeople Can Predict Which Social-Science Studies Will Be Replicated Successfully
Suzanne Hoogeveen et al.
ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2020)
Many Labs 5: Testing Pre-Data-Collection Peer Review as an Intervention to Increase Replicability
Charles R. Ebersole et al.
ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2020)
Registered Replication Report on Fischer, Castel, Dodd, and Pratt (2003)
Lincoln J. Colling et al.
ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2020)
Quantifying Sources of Variability in Infancy Research Using the Infant-Directed-Speech Preference
Michael C. Frank et al.
ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2020)
Reexamining the Effect of Gustatory Disgust on Moral Judgment: A Multilab Direct Replication of Eskine, Kacinik, and Prinz (2011)
Eric Ghelfi et al.
ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2020)
Competition for novelty reduces information sampling in a research game - a registered report
Leonid Tiokhin et al.
ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE (2019)
Why Replication Is Overrated
Uljana Feest
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE (2019)
Scientific discovery in a model-centric framework: Reproducibility, innovation, and epistemic diversity
Berne Devezer et al.
PLOS ONE (2019)
What's next for Registered Reports?
Chris Chambers
NATURE (2019)
Preregistration Is Hard, And Worthwhile
Brian A. Nosek et al.
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES (2019)
Calibrating the Scientific Ecosystem Through Meta-Research
Tom E. Hardwicke et al.
Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application (2019)
Predicting the replicability of social science lab experiments
Adam Altmejd et al.
PLOS ONE (2019)
A problem in theory
Michael Muthukrishna et al.
NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR (2019)
How Replicable Are Links Between Personality Traits and Consequential Life Outcomes? The Life Outcomes of Personality Replication Project
Christopher J. Soto
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2019)
Statistical Analyses for Studying Replication: Meta-Analytic Perspectives
Larry V. Hedges et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS (2019)
Evaluating effect size in psychological research: Sense and nonsense (vol 2, pg 156, 2019)
D. C. Funder et al.
ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2019)
Correcting for Bias in Psychology: A Comparison of Meta-Analytic Methods
Evan C. Carter et al.
ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2019)
99% Impossible: A Valid, or Falsifiable, Internal Meta-Analysis
Joachim Vosgerau et al.
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL (2019)
Predicting replication outcomes in the Many Labs 2 study
Eskil Forsell et al.
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY (2019)
Psychology's Renaissance
Leif D. Nelson et al.
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 69 (2018)
Metastudies for robust tests of theory
Beth Baribault et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2018)
Scientific progress despite irreproducibility: A seeming paradox
Richard M. Shiffrin et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2018)
The preregistration revolution
Brian A. Nosek et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2018)
Meet the ‘data thugs’ out to expose shoddy and questionable research
Adam Marcus
SCIENCE (2018)
Improving social and behavioral science by making replication mainstream: A response to commentaries Responses
Rolf A. Zwaan et al.
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES (2018)
Verify original results through reanalysis before replicating
Michele B. Nuijten et al.
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES (2018)
Data availability, reusability, and analytic reproducibility: evaluating the impact of a mandatory open data policy at the journal Cognition
Tom E. Hardwicke et al.
ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE (2018)
Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress
Simine Vazire
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2018)
The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing Psychology Through a Distributed Collaborative Network
Hannah Moshontz et al.
ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2018)
Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings
Richard A. Klein et al.
ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2018)
The Prior Odds of Testing a True Effect in Cognitive and Social Psychology
Brent M. Wilson et al.
ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2018)
An Investigation of Abstract Construal on Impression Formation: A Multi-Lab Replication of McCarthy and Skowronski (2011)
Randy J. McCarthy et al.
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY (2018)
Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015
Colin F. Camerer et al.
NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR (2018)
Registered Replication Report on Mazar, Amir, and Ariely (2008)
Bruno Verschuere et al.
ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2018)
Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results
R. Silberzahn et al.
ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2018)
A Unified Framework to Quantify the Credibility of Scientific Findings
Etienne P. LeBel et al.
ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2018)
Reflection on the Professor-Priming Replication Report
Ap Dijksterhuis
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2018)
Using OSF to Share Data: A Step-by-Step Guide
Courtney K. Soderberg
ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2018)
Registered Replication Report: Dijksterhuis and van Knippenberg (1998)
Michael O'Donnell et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2018)
Journal Article Reporting Standards for Quantitative Research in Psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board Task Force Report
Mark Appelbaum et al.
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST (2018)
Small is beautiful: In defense of the small-N design
Philip L. Smith et al.
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW (2018)
Novelty versus Replicability: Virtues and Vices in the Reward System of Science
Felipe Romero
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE (2017)
Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature
Denes Szucs et al.
PLOS BIOLOGY (2017)
Constraints on Generality (COG): A Proposed Addition to All Empirical Papers
Daniel J. Simons et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2017)
Intellectual Humility: Owning Our Limitations
Dennis Whitcomb et al.
PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH (2017)
A Collaborative Approach to Infant Research: Promoting Reproducibility, Best Practices, and Theory-Building
Michael C. Frank et al.
INFANCY (2017)
Cognitive and Interpersonal Features of Intellectual Humility
Mark R. Leary et al.
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN (2017)
The GRIM Test: A Simple Technique Detects Numerous Anomalies in the Reporting of Results in Psychology
Nicholas J. L. Brown et al.
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PERSONALITY SCIENCE (2017)
Registered Replication Report: Rand, Greene, and Nowak (2012)
S. Bouwmeester et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2017)
Observe, hypothesize, test, repeat: Luttrell, Petty and Xu (2017) demonstrate good science
Charles R. Ebersole et al.
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY (2017)
InvestigateDiscussEstimateAggregate for structured expert judgement
A. M. Hanea et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING (2017)
Association between contextual dependence and replicability in psychology may be spurious
Yoel Inbar
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2016)
Contextual sensitivity in scientific reproducibility
Jay J. Van Bavel et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2016)
Comment on Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
Daniel T. Gilbert et al.
SCIENCE (2016)
Response to Comment on Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
Christopher J. Anderson et al.
SCIENCE (2016)
Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics
Colin F. Camerer et al.
SCIENCE (2016)
Scientists' Reputations Are Based on Getting It Right, Not Being Right
Charles R. Ebersole et al.
PLOS BIOLOGY (2016)
Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices: A Simple, Low-Cost, Effective Method for Increasing Transparency
Mallory C. Kidwell et al.
PLOS BIOLOGY (2016)
Comment: The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship
Mark D. Wilkinson et al.
SCIENTIFIC DATA (2016)
The natural selection of bad science
Paul E. Smaldino et al.
ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE (2016)
A Bayesian Perspective on the Reproducibility Project: Psychology
Alexander Etz et al.
PLOS ONE (2016)
Registered Replication Report: Hart & Albarracin (2011)
A. Eerland et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2016)
Underreporting in Psychology Experiments: Evidence From a Study Registry
Annie Franco et al.
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PERSONALITY SCIENCE (2016)
Many Labs 3: Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication
Charles R. Ebersole et al.
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY (2016)
Registered Replication Report: Strack, Martin, & Stepper (1988)
E. -J. Wagenmakers et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2016)
The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985-2013)
Michele B. Nuijten et al.
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS (2016)
Registered Replication Report: Study 1 From Finkel, Rusbult, Kumashiro, & Hannon (2002)
Irene Cheung et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2016)
Increasing Transparency Through a Multiverse Analysis
Sara Steegen et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2016)
The pipeline project: Pre-publication independent replications of a single laboratory's research pipeline
Martin Schweinsberg et al.
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY (2016)
The what, why, and how of born-open data
Jeffrey N. Rouder
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS (2016)
On the scientific superiority of conceptual replications for scientific progress
Christian S. Crandall et al.
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY (2016)
What Should Researchers Expect When They Replicate Studies? A Statistical View of Replicability in Psychological Science
Prasad Patil et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2016)
A Multilab Preregistered Replication of the Ego-Depletion Effect
Martin S. Hagger et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2016)
Using prediction markets to estimate the reproducibility of scientific research
Anna Dreber et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2015)
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
Alexander A. Aarts et al.
SCIENCE (2015)
Promoting an open research culture
B. A. Nosek et al.
SCIENCE (2015)
The Reputational Consequences of Failed Replications and Wrongness Admission among Scientists
Adam K. Fetterman et al.
PLOS ONE (2015)
A Short (Personal) Future History of Revolution 2.0
Barbara A. Spellman
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2015)
Is Psychology Suffering From a Replication Crisis? What Does Failure to Replicate Really Mean?
Scott E. Maxwell et al.
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST (2015)
A Powerful Nudge? Presenting Calculable Consequences of Underpowered Research Shifts Incentives Toward Adequately Powered Designs
Will M. Gervais et al.
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PERSONALITY SCIENCE (2015)
The Replication Paradox: Combining Studies can Decrease Accuracy of Effect Size Estimates
Michele B. Nuijten et al.
REVIEW OF GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY (2015)
Small Telescopes: Detectability and the Evaluation of Replication Results
Uri Simonsohn
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2015)
Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer
Annie Franco et al.
SCIENCE (2014)
How to Make More Published Research True
John P. A. Ioannidis
PLOS MEDICINE (2014)
Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors
Andrew Gelman et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2014)
The Alleged Crisis and the Illusion of Exact Replication
Wolfgang Stroebe et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2014)
The Value of Direct Replication
Daniel J. Simons
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2014)
Investigating Variation in Replicability A Many Labs'' Replication Project
Richard A. Klein et al.
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY (2014)
Bayesian Tests to Quantify the Result of a Replication Attempt
Josine Verhagen et al.
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL (2014)
Safeguard Power as a Protection Against Imprecise Power Estimates
Marco Perugini et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2014)
Priming, Replication, and the Hardest Science
Joseph Cesario
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2014)
Registered Replication Report: Schooler and Engstler-Schooler (1990)
V. K. Alogna et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2014)
Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience
Katherine S. Button et al.
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE (2013)
Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries
Daniele Fanelli
SCIENTOMETRICS (2012)
The Ironic Effect of Significant Results on the Credibility of Multiple-Study Articles
Ulrich Schimmack
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS (2012)
An Agenda for Purely Confirmatory Research
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2012)
Scientific Utopia: II. Restructuring Incentives and Practices to Promote Truth Over Publishability
Brian A. Nosek et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2012)
The Rules of the Game Called Psychological Science
Marjan Bakker et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2012)
Science or Art? How Aesthetic Standards Grease the Way Through the Publication Bottleneck but Undermine Science
Roger Giner-Sorolla
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2012)
Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling
Leslie K. John et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2012)
Willingness to Share Research Data Is Related to the Strength of the Evidence and the Quality of Reporting of Statistical Results
Jelte M. Wicherts et al.
PLOS ONE (2011)
Why Psychologists Must Change the Way They Analyze Their Data: The Case of Psi: Comment on Bem (2011)
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers et al.
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY (2011)
False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant
Joseph P. Simmons et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2011)
The (mis)reporting of statistical results in psychology journals
Marjan Bakker et al.
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS (2011)
Positive Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences
Daniele Fanelli
PLOS ONE (2010)
Shall We Really Do It Again? The Powerful Concept of Replication Is Neglected in the Social Sciences
Stefan Schmidt
REVIEW OF GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY (2009)
Why most discovered true associations are inflated
John P. A. Ioannidis
EPIDEMIOLOGY (2008)
Normative dissonance in science: Results from a national survey of US scientists
Melissa S. Anderson et al.
JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS (2007)
Why most published research findings are false
JPA Ioannidis
PLOS MEDICINE (2005)
Early extreme contradictory estimates may appear in published research: The Proteus phenomenon in molecular genetics research and randomized trials
JPA Ioannidis et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2005)
The persistence of underpowered studies in psychological research: Causes, consequences, and remedies
SE Maxwell
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS (2004)
Experiences of collaborative research
D Kahneman
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST (2003)
分享论文
