4.5 Review

The Diverse Physiological Functions of Mechanically Activated Ion Channels in Mammals

期刊

ANNUAL REVIEW OF PHYSIOLOGY
卷 84, 期 -, 页码 307-329

出版社

ANNUAL REVIEWS
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-060721-100935

关键词

mechanically activated ion channels; PIEZO1; PIEZO2; TRPV4; TREK-1; mechanotransduction

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [APP1122104, APP1138595]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many aspects of mammalian physiology are regulated by mechanical processes, and mechanically activated ion channels play a vital role in this mechanotransduction. These ion channels act as force sensors and are directly activated by mechanical inputs, leading to changes in ionic flux across the plasma membrane. Recent research has revealed the widespread expression of these channels in mammalian cells, not only in touch sensation and hearing, but also in various other processes such as the development of mechanoresponsive structures and mechanically driven homeostatic maintenance. The diverse functions of mechanically activated ion channels highlight their significance in mammalian physiology.
Many aspects of mammalian physiology are mechanically regulated. One set of molecules that can mediate mechanotransduction are the mechanically activated ion channels. These ionotropic force sensors are directly activated by mechanical inputs, resulting in ionic flux across the plasma membrane. While there has been much research focus on the role of mechanically activated ion channels in touch sensation and hearing, recent data have highlighted the broad expression pattern of these molecules in mammalian cells. Disruption of mechanically activated channels has been shown to impact (a) the development of mechanoresponsive structures, (b) acute mechanical sensing, and (c) mechanically driven homeostatic maintenance in multiple tissue types. The diversity of processes impacted by these molecules highlights the importance of mechanically activated ion channels in mammalian physiology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据