4.7 Article

Optimal Region of Lymph Node Dissection in Distal Pancreatectomy for Left-Sided Pancreatic Cancer Based on Tumor Location

期刊

ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 29, 期 4, 页码 2414-2424

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-11108-5

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explored the importance of lymph node dissection for left-sided pancreatic cancer based on tumor location, showing that dissection of the non-PLN region can be avoided in patients with DPT >= 20 mm. Non-PLN metastasis was associated with a poorer prognosis compared to only-PLN metastasis.
Background The optimal lymph node (LN) dissection for left-sided pancreatic cancer based on tumor location has remained unknown. In particular, the efficacy of LN dissection around the common hepatic artery and the celiac axis for distal tumors has not been established. This study was designed to elucidate the frequency and prognostic impact of LN metastasis, focusing on tumor location. Methods Data from 110 patients with invasive pancreatic cancer who underwent distal pancreatectomy between 2007 and 2020 were collected. We used a quantitative value?the distance between the left side of the portal vein and the right side of tumor (DPT)?to define the tumor location. LN stations were divided into two groups: peripancreatic lymph nodes (PLN) and non-PLN. We then analyzed the frequency of LN metastasis based on the tumor location and prognostic factors. Results Non-PLN metastasis was observed in 7.3% of patients. Non-PLN metastasis was found only in patients with a DPT < 20 mm. Patients with non-PLN metastasis exhibited a significantly worse prognosis than those with only-PLN metastasis (median survival time: 20.3 vs. 42.5 months, p = 0.048). Multivariate analysis for survival indicated that tumor size > 4 cm (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.23, p = 0.012) and metastasis in the non-PLN region (HR: 3.02, p = 0.015), and inability to undergo adjuvant chemotherapy (HR: 2.81, p = 0.0018) were also associated with poor prognosis. Conclusions Dissection of the non-PLN region can be avoided in selected patients with DPT >= 20 mm.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据