Mortality following workplace injury: Quantitative bias analysis

Purpose: Recent studies have shown increased all-cause mortality among workers following disabling workplace injury. These studies did not account for 2 potentially important confounders, smoking and obesity. We estimated injury-related mortality accounting for these factors. Methods: We followed workers receiving New Mexico workers' compensation benefits (1994-20 0 0) through 2013. Using data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics, we derived the joint distribution of smoking status and obesity for workers with and without lost-time injuries. We conducted a quantitative bias analysis (QBA) to determine the adjusted relationship of injury and mortality. Results: We observed hazard ratios after adjusting for smoking and obesity of 1.13 for women (95% simulation interval (SI) 0.97 to 1.31) and 1.12 for men (95% SI 1.00 to 1.27). The estimated fully adjusted excess hazard was about half the estimates not adjusted for these factors. Conclusions: Using QBA to adjust for smoking and obesity reduced the estimated mortality hazard from lost-time injuries and widened the simulation interval. The adjusted estimate still showed more than a 10 percent increase for both women and men. The change in estimates reveals the importance of accounting for these confounders. Of course, the results depend on the methods and assumptions used. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Automated summary

Recent studies have shown that smoking and obesity are important factors affecting the mortality rate after workplace injuries among workers receiving workers' compensation benefits. Adjusting for these factors, the mortality rate for both women and men increased by more than 10%, highlighting the importance of considering these confounders.