4.6 Article

Dietary ferulic acid supplementation improves intestinal antioxidant capacity and intestinal barrier function in weaned piglets

期刊

ANIMAL BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 33, 期 2, 页码 356-361

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10495398.2021.2003807

关键词

Weaned piglets; ferulic acid; antioxidant capacity; intestinal barrier function

资金

  1. Sichuan Youth Science and Technology Innovation Research Team Project [2020JDTD0026]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFD0500403]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that dietary supplementation of 0.05% and 0.45% ferulic acid significantly increased intestinal antioxidant capacity and intestinal barrier function in weaned piglets.
This study was conducted to explore the effects of dietary ferulic acid (FA) supplementation on intestinal antioxidant capacity and intestinal barrier function in weaned piglets. Eighteen 21-day-old castrated male DLY (Duroc x Landrace x Yorkshire) weaned piglets were randomly divided into control, 0.05% FA, and 0.45% FA groups, respectively. The experiment lasted for 5 weeks. The results showed that dietary 0.05 and 0.45% FA supplementation significantly increased catalase activity (p < 0.001), the protein levels of nuclear factor E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) and NAD(P)H quinone dehydrogenase 1 (p < 0.05), and the mRNA levels of superoxide dismutase 1, glutathione reductase and Nrf2 (p < 0.05) in jejunum when compared with the control group. Dietary 0.05% FA supplementation also increased the mRNA level of glutathione S-transferase (p < 0.05) in jejunum. Meanwhile, Dietary 0.05 and 0.45% FA supplementation significantly increased the protein expression of zonula occludens 1 (ZO-1) (p < 0.05), and dietary supplementation of 0.05% FA increased the mRNA levels of ZO-1, zonula occludens 2, mucin 1, mucin 2, occluding, and claudin-1 (p < 0.05) in jejunum. Together, our data suggest that dietary 0.05% FA supplementation improves the intestinal antioxidant capacity and intestinal barrier function of weaned piglets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据