4.6 Review

The vascularization paradox of non-union formation

期刊

ANGIOGENESIS
卷 25, 期 3, 页码 279-290

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10456-022-09832-x

关键词

Non-union; Vascularization; Angiogenesis; Bone healing; VEGF; Bone healing

资金

  1. Projekt DEAL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite extensive research on vascularization for bone regeneration, stimulating blood vessel formation alone is not sufficient to address non-union formation. Experimental studies suggest that non-union callus tissue is densely vascularized and expresses pro-angiogenic factors adequately. Further understanding of the molecular and cellular basis of non-union vascularization may lead to improved treatment approaches or prevention strategies.
Despite major research efforts to elucidate mechanisms of non-union formation, failed fracture healing remains a common complication in orthopedic surgery. Adequate vascularization has been recognized as a crucial factor for successful bone regeneration, as newly formed microvessels guarantee the supply of the callus tissue with vital oxygen, nutrients, and growth factors. Accordingly, a vast number of preclinical studies have focused on the development of vascularization strategies to stimulate fracture repair. However, recent evidence suggests that stimulation of blood vessel formation is an oversimplified approach to support bone regeneration. This review discusses the role of vascularization during bone regeneration and delineates a phenomenon, for which we coin the term the vascularization paradox of non-union-formation. This view is based on the results of a variety of experimental studies that suggest that the callus tissue of non-unions is indeed densely vascularized and that pro-angiogenic mediators, such as vascular endothelial growth factor, are sufficiently expressed at the facture site. By gaining further insights into the molecular and cellular basis of non-union vascularization, it may be possible to develop more optimized treatment approaches or even prevent the non-union formation in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据