4.8 Article

Accelerating Radiative Decay in Blue Through-Space Charge Transfer Emitters by Minimizing the Face-to-Face Donor-Acceptor Distances

期刊

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202200059

关键词

Blue Thermally Activated Delayed Fluorescence; Donor-Acceptor Distance; Organic Light-Emitting Diodes; TADF-Sensitized Fluorescence; Through-Space Charge Transfer

资金

  1. National Key Basic Research and Development Program of China [2017YFA0204501, 2020YFA0715000]
  2. Guangdong Major Project of Basic and Applied Basic Research [2019B030302009]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51903137, 61890942]
  4. Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by CAST [2019-2021QNRC]
  5. Foshan Xianhu Laboratory of the Advanced Energy Science and Technology Guangdong Laboratory [XHT2020-005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates the successful improvement of radiative decay rates of blue TSCT-TADF emitters by adopting a xanthene bridge to construct space-confined face-to-face donor-acceptor alignment.
Thermally activated delayed fluorophors (TADF) featuring through-space charge transfers (TSCT) suffer from low radiative decay rates (k(r)s), especially for blue emitters. Here, a xanthene bridge is adopted to construct space-confined face-to-face donor-acceptor alignment and minimize their distances down to 2.7-2.8 angstrom, even shorter than the interlayer distance of graphite and thus strengthening the electronic interactions. The resulting blue TSCT-TADF emitters exhibit peaks around approximate to 460 nm, photoluminescence quantum yields of >90 %, and k(r)s of nearly 10(7) s(-1), almost 2-10 times higher than previously observed values with comparable reverse intersystem crossing rates. The corresponding blue organic light-emitting diodes show maximum external quantum efficiencies of 27.8 % and 34.7 % with Commission Internationale de L'Eclairage y coordinates of 0.29 and 0.15 using those molecules as emitters and sensitizers, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据