4.8 Article

Ultra-Tough Elastomers from Stereochemistry-Directed Hydrogen Bonding in Isosorbide-Based Polymers

期刊

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202115904

关键词

Elastomers; Isomannide; Isosorbide; Polyurethane; Stereochemistry

资金

  1. Duke University
  2. National Science Foundation [DMR1535412, DMR-1507420]
  3. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant [751150]
  4. European Research Council [681559]
  5. Leverhulme Trust [RPG-2015-120]
  6. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [751150] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reports the synthesis of ultra-tough, reprocessable elastomers based on linear alternating polymers. The incorporation of a rigid isohexide adjacent to urethane moieties results in elastomers with exceptional mechanical properties and optical transparency. Isosorbide-based elastomers exhibit superior tensile strength and strain recovery.
The remarkable elasticity and tensile strength found in natural elastomers are challenging to mimic. Synthetic elastomers typically feature covalently cross-linked networks (rubbers), but this hinders their reprocessability. Physical cross-linking via hydrogen bonding or ordered crystallite domains can afford reprocessable elastomers, but often at the cost of performance. Herein, we report the synthesis of ultra-tough, reprocessable elastomers based on linear alternating polymers. The incorporation of a rigid isohexide adjacent to urethane moieties affords elastomers with exceptional strain hardening, strain rate dependent behavior, and high optical clarity. Distinct differences were observed between isomannide and isosorbide-based elastomers where the latter displays superior tensile strength and strain recovery. These phenomena are attributed to the regiochemical irregularities in the polymers arising from their distinct stereochemistry and respective inter-chain hydrogen bonding.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据