4.8 Article

Machine-Learning Prediction of Metal-Organic Framework Guest Accessibility from Linker and Metal Chemistry

期刊

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202114573

关键词

Database; Guest accessibility; Machine learning; Metal-organic frameworks; Porosity

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union [692685]
  2. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) Office of Sponsored Research (OSR) [OSR-2016-RPP-3273]
  3. Leverhulme Trust via the Leverhulme Research Centre for Functional Materials Design
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [692685] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The structure and guest accessibility of a MOF are determined by the choice of metal and linker. By analyzing experimental three-dimensional MOF structures and studying the chemical properties of the components, we can predict the guest accessibility of a MOF and provide guidance in component selection for exploratory MOF synthesis based on guest accessibility considerations.
The choice of metal and linker together define the structure and therefore the guest accessibility of a metal-organic framework (MOF), but the large number of possible metal-linker combinations makes the selection of components for synthesis challenging. We predict the guest accessibility of a MOF with 80.5% certainty based solely on the identity of these two components as chosen by the experimentalist, by decomposing reported experimental three-dimensional MOF structures in the Cambridge Structural Database into metal and linker and then learning the connection between the components' chemistry and the MOF porosity. Pore dimensions of the guest-accessible space are classified into four ranges with three sequential models. Both the dataset and the predictive models are available to download and offer simple guidance in prioritization of the choice of the components for exploratory MOF synthesis for separation and catalysis based on guest accessibility considerations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据