4.8 Article

A Lanthanum Ammonium Sulfate Double Salt with a Strong SHG Response and Wide Deep-UV Transparency

期刊

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202115855

关键词

Deep-ultraviolet; Hetero-cations; Nonlinear optics; Structure-property relationships; Sulfates

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51432006, 52002276]
  2. Ministry of Education of China for the Changjiang Innovation Research Team [IRT14R23]
  3. Ministry of Education
  4. State Administration of Foreign Experts Affairs for the 111 Project [B13025]
  5. Innovation Program of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission
  6. Australian Research Council [DP170100411]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reports the targeted synthesis of deep-UV non-linear optical material La(NH4)(SO4)(2) using a double-salt strategy. Optical studies show that this material exhibits a short-wavelength deep-UV absorption edge and the strongest SHG response among deep-UV NLO sulfates, attributed to the synergistic interaction of La3+ and [NH4]+.
The targeted synthesis of deep-ultraviolet (deep-UV) nonlinear optical (NLO) materials, especially those with non-pi-conjugated sulfates, has experienced considerable difficulties due to the need to reconcile the oft-competing requirements for deep-UV transparency and strong second-harmonic generation (SHG). We report herein the designed synthesis of the first rare-earth metal-based deep-UV sulfate La(NH4)(SO4)(2) by a double-salt strategy involving introduction of complementary cations, together with optical studies that reveal a short-wavelength deep-UV absorption edge (below 190 nm) and the strongest SHG response among deep-UV NLO sulfates (2.4xKDP). Theoretical calculations and crystal structure analysis suggest that the excellent balance between SHG response and deep-UV transparency can be attributed to a synergistic interaction of the hetero-cations La3+ and [NH4](+), which optimize alignment of the [SO4] tetrahedra and highly polarizable [LaO8] polyhedra.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据