4.8 Article

Simultaneous Kinetic Resolution and Asymmetric Induction within a Borrowing Hydrogen Cascade Mediated by a Single Catalyst

期刊

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202112993

关键词

-

资金

  1. Shenzhen Nobel Prize Scientists Laboratory Project
  2. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Catalysis [2020B121201002]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Guagndong Province [2021A1515010329]
  4. Center for Computational Science and Engineering at Southern University of Science and Technology
  5. Shenzhen YOUWEI Tech Group

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mechanistic uniqueness and versatility of borrowing hydrogen catalysis provides an opportunity to investigate the controllability of a cascade reaction, and more importantly, to realize either one or both of chiral recognition and chiral induction simultaneously. In this study, using a robust Ru-catalyst, both kinetic resolution and asymmetric induction were achieved with remarkable levels of efficiency and enantioselectivity, showing the importance of catalyst-substrate pi-pi interactions in realizing stereochemical diversity.
The mechanistic uniqueness and versatility of borrowing hydrogen catalysis provides an opportunity to investigate the controllability of a cascade reaction, and more importantly, to realize either one or both of chiral recognition and chiral induction simultaneously. Here we report that, in a borrowing hydrogen cascade starting from racemic allylic alcohols, one of the enantiomers could be kinetically resolved, while the other enantiomer could be purposely converted to various targeted products, including alpha,beta-unsaturated ketones, beta-functionalized ketones and gamma-functionalized alcohols. By employing a robust Ru-catalyst, both kinetic resolution and asymmetric induction were achieved with remarkable levels of efficiency and enantioselectivity. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations suggest that corresponding catalyst-substrate pi-pi interactions are pivotal to realize the observed stereochemical diversity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据