4.8 Article

Highly Efficient Synthesis of Poly(silylether)s: Access to Degradable Polymers from Renewable Resources

期刊

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202113443

关键词

Biobased Polymers; Degradable; Poly(Silylether)s; Recyclability; Renewable Monomers

资金

  1. CNRS
  2. Ecole polytechnique (AMX)
  3. ile-de-France Region [16016326]
  4. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [PID2019-109312GB-I00, RED2018-102387-T]
  5. Junta de Andalucia [P20_00513]
  6. Chimie ParisTech-PSL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces a novel material design strategy using platinum complexes to catalyze the formation of recyclable poly(silylether)s from biomass-derived building blocks under mild conditions. The obtained polymers exhibit low T-g values, thermal stability, and resistance towards uncatalyzed methanolysis, with the ability to be chemically recycled through acid-catalyzed hydrolysis or methanolysis, showing great potential as sustainable materials.
The design of new materials with tunable properties and intrinsic recyclability, derived from biomass under mild conditions, stands as a gold standard in polymer chemistry. Reported herein are platinum complexes which catalyze the formation of poly(silylether)s (PSEs) at low catalyst loadings. These polymers are directly obtained from dual-functional biobased building blocks such as 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) or vanillin, coupled with various dihydrosilanes. Access to different types of copolymer architectures (statistical or alternating) is highlighted by several synthetic strategies. The materials obtained were then characterized as low T-g materials (ranging from -60 to 29 degrees C), stable upon heating (T-5% up to 301 degrees C) and resistant towards uncatalyzed methanolysis. Additionally, quantitative chemical recycling of several PSEs could be triggered by acid-catalyzed hydrolysis or methanolysis. These results emphasize the interest of biobased poly(silylether)s as sustainable materials with high recycling potential.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据