4.4 Article

Assessment of seminal cystatin C levels in infertile men with varicocele: A preliminary study

期刊

ANDROLOGIA
卷 54, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/and.14278

关键词

cystatin C; male infertility; semen; varicocele

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Varicocele has been linked to male infertility, and improvements in sperm parameters post-varicocelectomy support this association. Cystatin C has been associated with cellular changes common in male infertility cases related to varicocele. This preliminary study found that seminal Cys C levels were significantly higher in infertile OAT men with varicocele compared to fertile men, and decreased post-operatively, suggesting a potential role of Cys C in varicocele-induced infertility.
Varicocele has been raised as a contributor to male infertility supported by the improvement of sperm parameters after varicocelectomy. Cystatin C (Cys C) has been linked to several cellular changes that are common in male infertility cases associated with varicocele such as apoptosis and autophagy. This preliminary study aimed to assess the seminal levels of Cys C in infertile oligoasthenoteratozoospermic (OAT) men associated with varicocele that have been shown to have spermatic vein vasodilation and active death pathway. Overall, 60 men were investigated being divided into two equivalent groups-infertile OAT men with varicocele who underwent varicocelectomy and healthy fertile men as a control group. These men were subjected to history taking, clinical examination, semen analysis and assessment of seminal Cys C pre and 6 months post-varicocelectomy. The results showed a significant increase of seminal Cys C in infertile OAT men with varicocele than the fertile control (55.57 +/- 25.6 ng/ml versus 10.78 +/- 1.88 ng/ml, p = .001). Seminal Cys C was a significantly decreased post-operative than its pre-operative level (34.69 +/- 14.02 versus 55.57 +/- 25.6 ng/ml, p = .01). These results show a potential role of Cys C in varicocele-induced infertility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据