4.4 Article

Determination of Cu and Mn in Seawater by High-Resolution Continuum Source Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrometry

期刊

ANALYTICAL LETTERS
卷 55, 期 10, 页码 1663-1671

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/00032719.2021.2020806

关键词

Copper; high-resolution continuum-source graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry; manganese; seawater

资金

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [19-0300181_a]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study compared the determination characteristics of copper and manganese in seawater by high-resolution continuum-source and low-resolution line-source graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry. HR-CS GFAAS can determine elements in undiluted samples, while LR-LS GFAAS only allows determination at double dilution. The detection and quantification limits for manganese were significantly lower in HR-CS GFAAS.
The conditions for the determination of copper and manganese in seawater by high-resolution continuum-source graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (HR-CS GFAAS) were optimized. The analytical properties were compared with those of low-resolution line source GFAAS (LR-LS GFAAS). The metrological characteristics were estimated considering the dilution of the sample and optimization of the temperature program of the electrothermal atomizer. Using HR-CS GFAAS, the elements were determined in undiluted samples, while LR-LS GFAAS allows the determination only at double dilution. The lower limits of determined Cu concentrations almost coincided for both versions of GFAAS. For manganese, the limits of detection and quantification were significantly lower for HR-CS GFAAS. Calibration curves were plotted using standard solutions. The proposed scheme was tested on water samples from the Sea of Okhotsk by standard addition. The detection limits (LODs) were 0.6 mu g L-1 for copper and 0.07 mu g L-1 for manganese by HR-CS GFAAS and 0.5 mu g L-1 for copper and 0.13 mu g L-1 for manganese by LR-LS GFAAS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据