4.8 Article

Quantifying Acidity in Heterogeneous Systems: Biphasic pKa Values

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 94, 期 9, 页码 4059-4064

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c05510

关键词

-

资金

  1. EMPIR programme [17FUN09]
  2. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme
  3. Estonian Research Council [PRG690]
  4. Erasmus+ Programme of the European Union [586571]
  5. EU [2014-2020.4.01.15-0011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study discusses the acidity of lipophilic compounds in systems consisting of an aqueous phase and an organic phase. The research shows that approximations using aqueous pK(a) values can lead to seriously biased estimations of acidities. By applying the concept of biphasic pK(a), a more accurate description of acidities is provided in this work.
Acidities of lipophilic compounds, such as various ligands or catalysts, in systems consisting of an aqueous phase at equilibrium with a water-immiscible phase (lipid bilayers, phase transfer catalysis, sensor membranes, to name just few) are typically approximated by the aqueous pK(a) values. Our research shows that such approximations can lead to seriously biased estimations of the acidities as the bulk of solvated H+ ions reside in the aqueous phase, while the lipophilic species-both neutral acid and anion-predominantly reside in the organic phase. Therefore, the use of aqueous pK(a) in such situations is not justified. In this work, we provide a more accurate description of the acidities of acids in such systems by applying the biphasic pK(a) concept. Biphasic pK(a) values (pK(a)(ow) values) of 35 acids of various structures and chemical properties were determined in a 1-octanol:water system. We provide detailed descriptions of the UV-vis and NMR measurement methods. The directly obtained (apparent) pKaow values depend on concentration. Concentration-independent values were obtained by extrapolating the apparent values to zero concentration using a Debye-Huckel model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据