4.8 Article

Electroanalytical Paper-Based Nucleic Acid Amplification Biosensors with Integrated Thread Electrodes

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 93, 期 42, 页码 14187-14195

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c02900

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council [715268]
  2. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The 3D microfluidic paper-based electrochemical NAAT presented in this study combines sensitive detection of target DNA with the integration of thread electrodes within paper devices, allowing for time-sequenced reactions. This innovative approach showed high sensitivity and specificity in detecting toxic microalgae within a short period of 95 minutes.
Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) are very sensitive and specific methods, but they mainly rely on centralized laboratories and therefore are not suitable for point-of-care testing. Here, we present a 3D microfluidic paper-based electrochemical NAAT. These devices use off-the-shelf gold plasma-coated threads to integrate electroanalytical readouts using ex situ self-assembled monolayer formation on the threads prior to assembling into the paper device. They further include a sandwich hybridization assay with sample incubation, rinsing, and detection steps all integrated using movable stacks of filter papers to allow time-sequenced reactions. The devices use glass fiber substrates for storing recombinase polymerase amplification reagents and conducting the isothermal amplification. We used the paper-based device for the detection of the toxic microalgae Ostreopsis cf. ovata. The NAAT, completed in 95 min, attained a limit of detection of 0.06 pM target synthetic DNA and was able to detect 1 ng/mu L O. cf. ovata genomic DNA with negligible cross-reactivity from a closely related microalgae species. We think that the integration of thread electrodes within paper-based devices paves the way for digital one-time use NAATs and numerous other advanced electroanalytical paper- or textile-based devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据