4.8 Article

Rapid Cyanobacteria Species Identification with High Sensitivity Using Native Mass Spectrometry

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 93, 期 42, 页码 14293-14299

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c03412

关键词

-

资金

  1. BBSRC [BB/S019456/1, BB/T015640/1]
  2. Royal Society of Chemistry [RGS \R1\201411]
  3. NERC (NERC Scientific support Facilities) [NE/R017050/1]
  4. University of Birmingham
  5. BBSRC [BB/S019456/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates the rapid and precise identification of cyanobacteria from diverse aquatic environments using native mass spectrometry, creating unique mass spectral fingerprints by monitoring phycobiliproteins. The method is 10-fold more sensitive than current mass spectrometric methods, allowing for monitoring of cyanobacteria before bloom formation with great potential for simultaneous detection and identification of co-existing cyanobacteria in situ.
Cyanobacteria have evolved over billions of years to adapt and survive in diverse climates. Environmentally, this presents a huge challenge because cyanobacteria can now rapidly form algae blooms that are detrimental to aquatic life. In addition, many cyanobacteria produce toxins, making them hazardous to animals and humans that they encounter. Rapid identification of cyanobacteria is essential to monitor and prevent toxic algae blooms. Here, we show for the first time how native mass spectrometry can quickly and precisely identify cyanobacteria from diverse aquatic environments. By monitoring phycobiliproteins, abundant protein complexes within cyanobacteria, simple, easy-to-understand mass spectral fingerprints were created that were unique to each species. Moreover, our method is 10-fold more sensitive than the current MALDI-TOF mass spectrometric methods, meaning that cyanobacteria can be monitored using this technology prior to bloom formation. Together, the data show great promise for the simultaneous detection and identification of co-existing cyanobacteria in situ.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据