4.8 Article

Evaluating the Band Gaps of Semiconductors by Cataluminescence

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 93, 期 43, 页码 14454-14461

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c02913

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21874094, 22074098]
  2. Science & Technology Department of Sichuan Province [19YYJC2423]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study presents a rapid and cost-effective methodology for evaluating band gaps of semiconductors through cataluminescence signal, which can serve as an innovative alternative to traditional band gap assessment methods.
A rapid and efficient methodology for the evaluation of band gaps of semiconductors is highly desirable to analyze and assess the intrinsic properties and extending application scopes of semiconductor materials. Here, the negative correlation of the cataluminescence (CTL) signal in the presence of H2S and the band gap of Aurivillius-type perovskite oxide Bi4+nFenTi3O12+3n (n = 1-4) was confirmed, where the H2S-Sinduced CTL signal acts as a probe to evaluate the band gaps of semiconductor materials. The related mechanism shows that the thermal energy obtained by heating makes the electrons in the valence band more easily excite into the conduction band of a narrower band gap material and further promotes electron transfer between the gaseous compounds and semiconductor materials, causing acceleration of the catalytic oxide process. In addition, the extensibility was further verified by exploring the layered perovskite containing other structures, including Bi4+nConTi3O12+3n (n = 1-4), Bi5NiTi3O15, and Bi5MnTi3O15, which was also consistent with the results characterized by UV diffuse reflectance spectroscopy. The established CTL probe for band gap evaluation shows rapid response, is simple to operate, and is of low cost, which is expected to become an innovative alternative to the conventional band gap assessment approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据