4.7 Article

Simultaneous-Source Separation Using Iterative Seislet-Frame Thresholding

期刊

IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 197-201

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LGRS.2015.2505319

关键词

Deblending; distance-separated simultaneous-source data; iterative inversion; seislet frame; seislet transform

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41274137]
  2. National Science and Technology of Major Projects of China [2011ZX05019-006]
  3. National Engineering Laboratory of Offshore Oil Exploration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The distance-separated simultaneous-sourcing (DSSS) technique can make the smallest interference between different sources. In a distance-separated simultaneous-source acquisition with two sources, we propose the use of a novel iterative seislet-frame thresholding approach to separate the blended data. Because the separation is implemented in common shot gathers, there is no need for the random scheduling that is used in conventional simultaneous-source acquisition, where random scheduling is applied to ensure the incoherent property of blending noise in common midpoint, common receiver, or common offset gathers. Thus, DSSS becomes more flexible. The separation is based on the assumption that the local dips of the data from different sources are different. We can use the plane-wave destruction algorithm to simultaneously estimate the conflicting dips and then use seislet frames with two corresponding local dips to sparsify each signal component. Then, the different signal components can be easily separated. Compared with the FK-based approach, the proposed seislet-frame-based approach has the potential to obtain better separated components with less artifacts because the seislet frames are local transforms while the Fourier transform is a global transform. Both simulated synthetic and field data examples show very successful performance of the proposed approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据