4.7 Article

A Modified Locality-Preserving Projection Approach for Hyperspectral Image Classification

期刊

IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS
卷 13, 期 8, 页码 1059-1063

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LGRS.2016.2564993

关键词

Dimensionality reduction (DR); hyperspectral remote sensing; image classification; unsupervised learning

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [41371362, 41501391, 41272364]
  2. Major Special Project-the China High-Resolution Earth Observation System project
  3. National High-Tech R&D Program of China (863 Program) [2013AA12A302]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Locality-preserving projection (LPP) is a typical manifold-based dimensionality reduction (DR) method, which has been successfully applied to some pattern recognition tasks. However, LPP depends on an underlying adjacency graph, which has several problems when it is applied to hyperspectral image (HSI) processing. The adjacency graph is artificially created in advance, which may not be suitable for the following DR and classification. It is also difficult to determine an appropriate neighborhood size in graph construction. Additionally, only the information of local neighboring data points is considered in LPP, which is limited for improving classification accuracy. To address these problems, a modified version of the original LPP called MLPP is proposed for hyperspectral remote-sensing image classification. The idea is to select a different number of nearest neighbors for each data point adaptively and to focus on maximizing the distance between nonnearest neighboring points. This not only preserves the intrinsic geometric structure of the data but also increases the separability among ground objects with different spectral characteristics. Moreover, MLPP does not depend on any parameters or prior knowledge. Experiments on two real HSIs from different sensors demonstrate that MLPP is remarkably superior to other conventional DR methods in enhancing classification performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据