4.7 Article

Aerosol analysis by micro laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy: A new protocol for particulate matter characterization in filters

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 1181, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2021.338947

关键词

Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy; Filter characterization; Atmospheric aerosols; Micro LIBS imaging; Antarctica

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science research program [CTM2017-82929-R, PID2020-112570RB-C21]
  2. Government of Aragon [E23_17D, E49_20R]
  3. Spanish Government
  4. European Social Fund
  5. University of Zaragoza
  6. UTM

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The article presents an innovative method based on micro laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy for characterizing PM collected in Antarctica, which can quickly obtain a global visualization of elemental PM composition under atmospheric pressure. This method can map the localization of pollutants in filters at high spatial resolution and speed.
Atmospheric aerosols (particulate matter - PM) affect the air quality and climate, even in remote areas, such as the Antarctic Region. Current techniques for continuous PM monitoring are usually complex, costly, time consuming and do not provide real-time measurements. In this work, based on micro laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS), an innovative method with an optical design and multi-elemental scanning imaging, is presented to characterize PM collected in filters from Antarctica. After following a simple protocol and under atmospheric pressure, the new approach allows to obtain a global visualization of the elemental PM composition of the filters with a minimum sample destruction and preparation. For the first time, we were able to map the localization of pollutants in filters at high spatial resolution and speed. This recent method offers a new insight on the characterization of PM, particularly in isolated areas, where no complex equipment and real time measurements are demanded. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据