4.6 Article

Cell-SELEX-based selection of ssDNA aptamers for specifically targeting BRAF V600E-mutated melanoma

期刊

ANALYST
卷 147, 期 1, 页码 187-195

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1an01579f

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province, China [2020-MS-174, 2020-MS-164]
  2. Shengyang Youth Science and Technology Project [RC190261]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Malignant melanoma is the most aggressive form of skin cancer, with BRAF mutations occurring in 40-50% of cases. Testing for BRAF mutations and targeted therapy have improved long-term survival for patients with BRAF-mutated melanoma. The aptamers CH1 and CH5 show high affinity for BRAF V600E-mutated cells and have potential as molecular probes for detecting metastatic melanoma.
Malignant melanoma is regarded as the most aggressive form of skin cancer, and is responsible for most death caused by skin cancer. BRAF mutations occur in approximately 40-50% of melanomas, with V600E being the most common mutation. Testing for BRAF mutations and targeted therapy have markedly improved long-term survival for patients with BRAF-mutated melanoma. Here, we report two aptamers, CH1 and CH5 generated by Cell-SELEX, against BRAF V600E-mutated human melanoma cells A375. The two aptamers exhibited high affinity to target cells with low dissociation constants (K-d) in the nanomolar range. Furthermore, the binding of two aptamers to target cells was independent of incubation temperature, and their molecular targets were demonstrated to be membrane proteins on the cell surface. We also demonstrated that aptamer CH1 was able to bind to metastatic colorectal cancer cells harboring BRAF V600E mutation, indicating a relationship between aptamer CH1 and BRAF V600E-related metastatic cancer. Owing to the structure stability and high selectivity to BRAF V600E-mutated targeting cells, aptamer CH1 holds great potential as a molecular probe for the detection of BRAF V600E-mutated metastatic melanoma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据