4.6 Article

The negative impact of T cell-mediated rejection on renal allograft survival in the modern era

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
卷 22, 期 3, 页码 761-771

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16883

关键词

antibody-mediated rejection; clinical research/practice; graft survival; histocompatibility; immunosuppression/immune modulation; kidney transplantation; patient survival; T cell-mediated rejection

资金

  1. Paul I Terasaki Research Fund - CIHR New Investigator award
  2. Flynn Family Chair in Renal Transplantation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study shows that in kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus/mycophenolate-based maintenance therapy, TCMR is common, correlates with HLA-DR/DQ molecular mismatch scores, and is associated with the risk of graft loss.
The prevalence and long-term impact of T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) is poorly defined in the modern era of tacrolimus/mycophenolate-based maintenance therapy. This observational study evaluated 775 kidney transplant recipients with serial histology and correlated TCMR events with the risk of graft loss. After a similar to 30% incidence of a first Banff Borderline or greater TCMR detected on for-cause (17%) or surveillance (13%) biopsies, persistent (37.4%) or subsequent (26.3%) TCMR occurred in 64% of recipients on follow-up biopsies. Alloimmune risk categories based on the HLA-DR/DQ single molecule eplet molecular mismatch correlated with the number of TCMR events (p = .002) and Banff TCMR grade (p = .007). Both a first and second TCMR event correlated with death-censored and all-cause graft loss when adjusted for baseline covariates and other significant time-dependent covariates such as DGF and ABMR. Therefore, a substantial portion of kidney transplant recipients, especially those with intermediate and high HLA-DR/DQ molecular mismatch scores, remain under-immunosuppressed, which in turn identifies the need for novel agents that can more effectively prevent or treat TCMR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据