4.6 Review

Intestinal secretory mechanisms and diarrhea

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00316.2021

关键词

chloride secretion; diarrhea; epithelial transport

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [DK28305]
  2. Science Foundation Ireland
  3. Estratest Settlement Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

One of the primary functions of the intestinal epithelium is to regulate the transport of fluid and electrolytes. Under normal circumstances, absorption is predominant, enabling conservation of water. However, in secretory diarrhea, excessive fluid secretion overwhelms absorption, leading to water loss in stool. This review discusses the regulation of Cl- and fluid secretion in the intestine, dysregulation in secretory diarrhea, therapeutic approaches, and innovative strategies for treating constipation by exploiting intestinal secretory mechanisms.
One of the primary functions of the intestinal epithelium is to transport fluid and electrolytes to and from the luminal contents. Under normal circumstances, absorptive and secretory processes are tightly regulated such that absorption predominates, thereby enabling conservation of the large volumes of water that pass through the intestine each day. However, in conditions of secretory diarrhea, this balance becomes dysregulated, so that fluid secretion, driven primarily by Cl- secretion, overwhelms absorptive capacity, leading to increased loss of water in the stool. Secretory diarrheas are common and include those induced by pathogenic bacteria and viruses, allergens, and disruptions to bile acid homeostasis, or as a side effect of many drugs. Here, we review the cellular and molecular mechanisms by which Cl- and fluid secretion in the intestine are regulated, how these mechanisms become dysregulated in conditions of secretory diarrhea, currently available and emerging therapeutic approaches, and how new strategies to exploit intestinal secretory mechanisms are successfully being used in the treatment of constipation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据