4.6 Article

Experiment and computational fluid dynamics investigation of biochar elutriation in fluidized bed

期刊

AICHE JOURNAL
卷 68, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/aic.17506

关键词

biochar; biomass pyrolysis; computational fluid dynamics; discrete element modeling; elutriation

资金

  1. United States Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research utilized a video-based continuous measurement method to investigate the elutriation rate of biochar in a fluidized bed, simulated using computational fluid dynamics-coarse-grained discrete element method (CFD-CGDEM) in MFiX. The study found that the fluidization behavior of nonspherical sands can be accurately captured with the use of a rolling friction model, and the predicted elutriation rate closely matched experimental results when considering particle size distributions and using a shape-corrected filtered drag. These findings validate the accuracy of the MFiX-based CFD framework for predicting biochar elutriations in fluidized bed biomass fast pyrolysis reactors.
In fluidized bed biomass fast pyrolysis, the biomass is converted to biochar and elutriated. The elutriation rate is a key parameter in reactor designs and operations. This research presents a video-based continuous measurement of biochar elutriation rate in a fluidized bed with sands and biomass as bed materials. The fluidized bed is simulated with the computational fluid dynamics-coarse-grained discrete element method (CFD-CGDEM) in MFiX. The fluidization behavior of nonspherical sands can be more accurately captured when a rolling friction model is used. The predicted elutriation rate is close to the experimental measurement when the particle size distributions are considered and the filtered drag with a shape correction is used. These results validated the accuracy of the MFiX-based CFD framework for the prediction of biochar elutriations in the fluidized bed biomass fast pyrolysis reactor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据