4.7 Review

The effect of protective covers on pollinator health and pollination service delivery

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2021.107556

关键词

Covered cropping; Ecosystem services; Bee orientation; Pollinator management; Pollinator fitness; Protected agriculture; Stocking rate

资金

  1. Seed Purity Pty Ltd: Novel technologies and practices for the optimisation of pollination within protected cropping environments [CON001793]
  2. Ian Potter Foundation (Australia)
  3. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) PhD top-up scholarship
  4. Zespri Group Limited
  5. New Zealand Ministry for Primary Industries Sustainable Farming Fund (SFF) : optimising pollination of Gold3 kiwi-fruit under hail netting [404958]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Protective covers such as glasshouses, netting enclosures, and polytunnels are increasingly used in crop production to enhance crop quality, yield, and production efficiency. Bees are the dominant taxon used in protected systems, with 90% of studies using eusocial bees. However, negative effects on pollinator health have been observed in over 50% of studies, possibly due to changes in environmental conditions and reduced access to food resources. Strategies to enhance pollinator health and efficiency in covered systems include careful bee hive location selection, increased floral diversity, and manipulation of flower physiology. Practitioners need to ensure that crop pollination services are compatible with suitable conditions for pollinator health to safeguard crop yields in pollinator dependent protected cropping systems.
Protective covers (i.e., glasshouses, netting enclosures, and polytunnels) are increasingly used in crop production to enhance crop quality, yield, and production efficiency. However, many protected crops require insect pollinators to achieve optimal pollination and there is no consensus about how best to manage pollinators and crop pollination in these environments. We conducted a systematic literature review to synthesise knowledge about the effect of protective covers on pollinator health and pollination services and identified 290 relevant studies. Bees were the dominant taxon used in protected systems (90%), represented by eusocial bees (e.g., bumble bees (Bombus spp.), honey bees (Apis spp.), stingless bees (Apidae: Meliponini)) and solitary bees (e.g., Amegilla spp., Megachile spp., and Osmia spp.). Flies represented 9% of taxa and included Calliphoridae, Muscidae, and Syrphidae. The remaining 1% of taxa was represented by Lepidoptera and Coleoptera. Of the studies that assessed pollination services, 96% indicate that pollinators were active on the crop and/or their visits resulted in improved fruit production compared with flowers not visited by insects (i.e., insect visits prevented, or flowers were self- or mechanically pollinated). Only 20% of studies evaluated pollinator health. Some taxa, such as mason or leafcutter bees, and bumble bees can function well in covered environments, but the effect of covers on pollinator health was negative in over 50% of the studies in which health was assessed. Negative effects included decreased reproduction, adult mortality, reduced forager activity, and increased disease prevalence. These effects may have occurred as a result of changes in temperature/humidity, light quality/quantity, pesticide exposure, and/or reduced access to food resources. Strategies reported to successfully enhance pollinator health and efficiency in covered systems include: careful selection of bee hive location to reduce heat stress and improve dispersal through the crop; increased floral diversity; deploying appropriate numbers of pollinators; and manipulation of flower physiology to increase attractiveness to pollinating insects. To improve and safeguard crop yields in pollinator dependent protected cropping systems, practitioners need to ensure that delivery of crop pollination services is compatible with suitable conditions for pollinator health.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据