4.7 Article

Sunfleck properties from time series of fluctuating light

期刊

AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY
卷 308, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108554

关键词

Solar radiation; Sunfleck; Shade; Crops; Spectral composition; Canopy architecture

资金

  1. Academy of Finland [324, 555]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the characteristics of sunflecks and how different plant canopies produce sunflecks with varying properties. High-frequency irradiance measurements revealed that shorter wind-induced sunflecks contribute significantly to the irradiance available for photosynthesis, and variations in sunfleck properties were observed related to canopy depth and species.
Light in canopies is highly dynamic since the strength and composition of incoming radiation is determined by the wind and the Sun's trajectory and by canopy structure. For this highly dynamic environment, we mathematically defined sunflecks as periods of high irradiance relative to the background light environment. They can account for a large proportion of the light available for photosynthesis. Based on high-frequency irradiance measurements with a CCD array spectroradiometer, we investigated how the frequency of measurement affects what we define as sunflecks. Do different plant canopies produce sunflecks with different properties? How does the spectral composition and strength of irradiance in the shade vary during a sunfleck? Our results suggest that high-frequency measurements improved our description of light fluctuations and led to the detection of shorter, more frequent and intense sunflecks. We found that shorter wind-induced sunflecks contribute most of the irradiance attributable to sunflecks, contrary to previous reports from both forests and crops. Large variations in sunfleck properties related to canopy depth and species, including distinct spectral composition under shade and sunflecks, suggest that mapping canopy structural traits may help us model photosynthesis dynamically.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据