4.7 Review

Subjective cognitive decline in idiopathic Parkinson′s disease: A systematic review

期刊

AGEING RESEARCH REVIEWS
卷 74, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2021.101508

关键词

Subjective cognitive decline (SCD); Mild cognitive impairment (MCI); Alzheimer ' s disease (AD); Parkinsons ' disease (PD); Parkinsons ' disease with dementia (PD-D)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cognitive symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD) are highly disabling non-motor features of the disease. The concept of subjective cognitive decline (SCD) has gained interest for earlier detection of cognitive decline in PD.
Cognitive symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD) have been long underestimated, but are some of the most disabling non-motor features of the disease. In order to establish signs that allow for earlier detection of cognitive decline in PD, the concept of `subjective cognitive decline & PRIME; (SCD) has gained a growing interest. SCD refers to patients who report a decline in subjective cognitive capacities, while their results on neuropsychological tests are within the normal performance range, indicating adequate cognitive functions. The aim of this review was to evaluate the concept of SCD in PD and give an overview of the current research. A systematic literature search in PubMed was performed to identify articles published before December 2020. We included 18 studies with a total of n = 2,654 patients. While there is currently no consensus on research or clinical criteria for SCD in PD, this review presents the accumulated evidence for SCD in PD patients and supports the importance of early identification of cognitive deficits, due to the relatively high prevalence for SCD in PD and the added risk of future cognitive impairment it entails. The publications included in this review indicate that SCD may be part of the PD spectrum but further research is needed. Expanding research on SCD in PD will allow for earlier detection of cognitive impairment and may foster preventive interventions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据