4.7 Article

Event-triggered fractional-order sliding mode control technique for stabilization of disturbed quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicles

期刊

AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 121, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2022.107337

关键词

Event-triggered control; Sliding mode control; Fractional-order surface; Quadrotor; Aerial vehicle

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), Taiwan [MOST 110-2221-E-224-050-]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, an event-trigger-based fractional-order sliding mode control strategy is expanded as an implementation technique for the stabilization of quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicles in the existence of external random/time-varying disturbances. The performance of the suggested control algorithm is investigated through several numerical simulations, and the results demonstrate the efficiency and applicability of the designed control procedure compared to other control techniques.
In this study, an event-trigger-based fractional-order sliding mode control strategy is expanded as an implementation technique for the stabilization of quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicles in the existence of external random/time-varying disturbances. The planned control approach ensures the altitude and position tracking of the desired dynamics in the finite time, according to the Lyapunov technique. Moreover, thanks to the use of the event-triggering condition which is employed for the fractional-order sliding mode control technique, the control tasks avoid the frequent periodic execution and reduce the computing cost to achieve the best possible functionality of system. The performance of the suggested control algorithm is investigated through several numerical simulations. The tracking performances in the simulation outcomes illustrate the efficiency and applicability of the designed control procedure in comparison with other control techniques. (C) 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据