4.7 Article

Unknown input observer-based appointed-time funnel control for quadrotors

期刊

AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 126, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2022.107351

关键词

Appointed-time; Funnel control; Unknown input observer; Quadrotors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a novel appointed-time funnel control policy is proposed for quadrotors under environmental disturbances and parametric uncertainties. The control strategy utilizes unknown input observers to identify unknown system dynamics and regulates trajectory tracking error profiles within preassigned boundaries. The proposed approach improves the robustness of quadrotors and is validated through simulations and comparisons.
In this paper, an unknown input observer-based appointed-time funnel control policy is proposed for quadrotors suffering from environmental disturbances and parametric uncertainties. To improve the robustness of quadrotors, unknown input observers (UIOs) are respectively devised in trajectory and attitude levels to online identify unknown system dynamics via utilizing filtering manipulations, possessing a concise structure, low calculation consumption and asymptotic error convergence. Then, an appointed-time funnel control consisting of a modified funnel variable is proposed to regulate trajectory tracking error profiles within preassigned boundary without incurring singularity problem, where a continuous piecewise function is embedded to specify the funnel envelop, such that the stringent temporal constraints can be arbitrarily prescribed by operators, independent of initial states and system arguments. All error signals involved in quadrotor dynamics are demonstrated to be ultimately uniformly bounded (UUB) and trajectory tracking errors are constrained to designed funnel. Eventually, simulations and comparisons validate the effectiveness of proposed control approach. (c) 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据