4.5 Article

Utilization of Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors in Ovarian Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study of US Healthcare Claims Data

期刊

ADVANCES IN THERAPY
卷 39, 期 1, 页码 328-345

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12325-021-01959-5

关键词

Ovarian cancer; Real-world evidence; PARP inhibitors; Tolerability; Dose modification; Healthcare resource utilization

资金

  1. AstraZeneca

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to characterize the utilization of PARP inhibitors in women with ovarian cancer in the real-world setting. Differences were observed among licensed PARPi in terms of adverse event risk, dose modifications, treatment persistence, healthcare resource utilization, and costs.
Introduction We aimed to characterize real-world utilization of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) in women with ovarian cancer (OC). Methods This retrospective observational study of claims data from US MarketScan(R) Commercial/Medicare Supplemental databases included women with OC initiating olaparib, niraparib, or rucaparib from January 1, 2017, to May 31, 2019. Patients were observed from first outpatient prescription until at least 30 days' follow-up. Clinical events of interest (CEIs), based on adverse reactions in PARPi prescribing information, were identified from claims using ICD-9/10 codes. Other outcomes included dose modification, persistence, adherence, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and cost. Results Overall, 303, 348, and 162 women with OC received olaparib, niraparib, and rucaparib, respectively. During follow-up, risk of any CEI was higher with niraparib versus olaparib (odds ratio 3.36 [95% confidence interval 2.00-5.65]) and niraparib versus rucaparib (2.09 [1.10-3.95]), with no significant difference between rucaparib and olaparib (1.61 [0.93-2.79]). PARPi dose decreases were observed in 21.1%, 35.1%, and 30.2% of olaparib-, niraparib-, and rucaparib-treated patients, respectively. Persistence (no treatment gaps of more than 90 days) was significantly higher (P < 0.05) with olaparib (62.2%) versus niraparib (35.9%) and rucaparib (48.7%); adherence (medication possession ratio, MPR >= 80%) was 80.2% versus 38.6% and 63.2%, respectively (P < 0.001). Inpatient admissions and outpatient service use were higher with niraparib and rucaparib versus olaparib, reflected in mean (+/- standard deviation) total medical costs (excluding pharmacy) of $5393 +/- 8828 for olaparib, $7732 +/- 14,054 for niraparib, and $6868 +/- 7929 for rucaparib. Conclusion Differences between the licensed PARPi were observed in the risk of experiencing a CEI, likelihood of dose modifications, ability to receive continuous PARPi therapy, HCRU, and costs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据