4.6 Article

Visual navigation with fast landmark selection based on error analysis for asteroid descent stage

期刊

ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH
卷 68, 期 9, 页码 3765-3780

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2021.07.005

关键词

Asteroid descent stage; Visual navigation; Error analysis; Fast landmark selection; State fusion

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61673057, 61803028]
  2. Civil Aerospace Research Project of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper introduces a new navigation method that integrates absolute and relative visual information, and a fast landmark selection method for efficiency improvement. Through detailed error analysis and extended Kalman filter, the proposed methods demonstrate advancements in quality and efficiency for asteroid landing missions.
Visual navigation is one of the enabling technologies for asteroid landing missions. Quality and efficiency are of paramount impor-tance for determining its robustness and autonomy. This paper proposes a new navigation method, which integrates absolute and relative visual information for quality improvement, and a fast landmark selection method for efficiency purposes. The mapped 3D landmarks with their 2D projections measured in the descent image are primary inputs, and two navigation pipelines, using the extracted 3D-2D and 2D-2D landmark correspondences, are established separately. Then, error analysis, under measurement and system noises, is performed in detail, and based on it, a fast landmark selection algorithm is designed to improve the navigation efficiency. Moreover, the observation model for the attitude motion in adjacent image frames is constructed, followed by the fusion of absolute and relative navigation results using an extended Kalman filter. Finally, Monte Carlo simulations are conducted, and the numerical results demonstrate the advance-ment of the proposed methods in quality and efficiency. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of COSPAR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据