4.6 Article

Dynamics of the restricted three-body problem having elongated smaller primary with disc-like structure

期刊

ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH
卷 69, 期 9, 页码 3490-3501

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2022.02.022

关键词

CRTBP; Elongated smaller primary; Disc-like structure; Equilibrium points; Critical point; Stability

资金

  1. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Govt. of India [09/085(0126)/2019-EMR-1]
  2. Manipal University Jaipur [EF/2021-22/QE04-07]
  3. DST(SERB) Govt. of India [DST(SE RB)/(163)/2016-2017/506/AM]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper analyzes the dynamical behavior of the restricted three-body problem with an elongated smaller primary with a disc-like structure. It discusses the zero-velocity curve, equilibrium points, and their stability, emphasizing the impact of the disc-like structure and elongated primary body on the equilibrium points. The proposed problem is considered a credible model for describing motion within a disc-like structure.
In this paper, we have analysed the dynamical behavior of the restricted three-body problem having elongated smaller primary with disc-like structure. We discuss the zero-velocity curve, equilibrium points, and their stability by considering the different segment-length of the elongated primary and mass ratio of the primary. The impacts of disc-like structure and elongated primary body are observed on the equilibrium points and their stability analysis. We demonstrate that all collinear equilibrium points are unstable by varying the mass parameter mu and the segment length l. Further, the critical point for mass parameter mu(c) at non-collinear equilibrium points is calculated. Furthermore, we emphasize our discussion through an example by taking mass parameter mu = 0.01 < mu(c) and segment-length l = 0.01. Finally, we conclude that the proposed problem is a credible model for describing the infinitesimal body's motion in a disc-like structure with an elongated smaller primary. (C) 2022 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据