4.8 Article

Dynamically Tuneable Reflective Structural Coloration with Electroactive Conducting Polymer Nanocavities

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS
卷 33, 期 49, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.202105004

关键词

color-tuning; conductive polymer; electroactive nanocavity; reflective displays; structural colors

资金

  1. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research
  2. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  3. Swedish Research Council (VR)
  4. Wenner-Gren Foundations
  5. Swedish Government Strategic Research Area in Materials Science on Functional Materials at Linkoping University (Faculty Grant SFO-Mat-LiU) [2009 00971]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By using an electroactive conducting polymer as a spacer layer, dynamic control of structural colors across the visible spectrum with high brightness is achieved, along with high peak reflectance. This electroactive cavity concept may have particular use in reflective displays by allowing for tuneable monopixels that eliminate brightness limitations of traditional subpixel-based systems.
Dynamic control of structural colors across the visible spectrum with high brightness has proven to be a difficult challenge. Here, this is addressed with a tuneable reflective nano-optical cavity that uses an electroactive conducting polymer (poly(thieno[3,4-b]thiophene)) as spacer layer. Electrochemical doping and dedoping of the polymer spacer layer provides reversible tuning of the cavity's structural color throughout the entire visible range and beyond. Furthermore, the cavity provides high peak reflectance that varies only slightly between the reduced and oxidized states of the polymer. The results indicate that the polymer undergoes large reversible thickness changes upon redox tuning, aided by changes in optical properties and low visible absorption. The electroactive cavity concept may find particular use in reflective displays, by opening for tuneable monopixels that eliminate limitations in brightness of traditional subpixel-based systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据