4.8 Article

pH-Responsive Polymer Nanoparticles for Efficient Delivery of Cas9 Ribonucleoprotein With or Without Donor DNA

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS
卷 34, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.202110618

关键词

CRISPR-Cas9; genome editing; nanomedicine

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [4-UH3-NS111688]
  2. University of Wisconsin-Madison
  3. Wisconsin Institute for Discovery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reports the development of a facilely fabricated pH-responsive polymer nanoparticle for safe and efficient delivery of CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) for gene editing. These nanoparticles possess many desirable properties, making them potential candidates for clinical applications in genome editing.
Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)-associated protein 9 (Cas9) may offer new therapeutics for genetic diseases through gene disruption via nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) or gene correction via homology-directed repair (HDR). However, clinical translation of CRISPR technology is limited by the lack of safe and efficient delivery systems. Here, facilely fabricated pH-responsive polymer nanoparticles capable of safely and efficiently delivering Cas9 ribonucleoprotein alone (termed NHEJ-NP, diameter = 29.4 nm), or together with donor DNA (termed HDR-NP, diameter = 33.3 nm) are reported. Moreover, intravenously, intratracheally, and intramuscularly injected NHEJ-NP induces efficient gene editing in mouse liver, lung, and skeletal muscle, respectively. Intramuscularly injected HDR-NP also leads to muscle strength recovery in a Duchenne muscular dystrophy mouse model. NHEJ-NP and HDR-NP possess many desirable properties including high payload loading content, small and uniform sizes, high editing efficiency, good biocompatibility, low immunogenicity, and ease of production, storage, and transport, making them great interest for various genome editing applications with clinical potentials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据