4.8 Article

An Annealing Accelerator for Ising Spin Systems Based on In-Memory Complementary 2D FETs

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS
卷 34, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.202107076

关键词

2D materials; field-effect transistors; Ising spin lattices; simulated annealing

资金

  1. Army Research Office (ARO) [W911NF1920338]
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF) through the Pennsylvania State University 2D Crystal Consortium-Materials Innovation Platform (2DCCMIP) [DMR-1539916]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research explores the use of subthreshold Boltzmann transport and specific hardware acceleration for optimization calculations of Ising spin systems, demonstrating a search acceleration of up to 800x with SA compared to exhaustive search methods.
Metaheuristic algorithms such as simulated annealing (SA) are often implemented for optimization in combinatorial problems, especially for discreet problems. SA employs a stochastic search, where high-energy transitions (hill-climbing) are allowed with a temperature-dependent probability to escape local optima. Ising spin glass systems have properties such as spin disorder and frustration and provide a discreet combinatorial problem with a high number of metastable states and ground-state degeneracy. In this work, subthreshold Boltzmann transport is exploited in complementary 2D field-effect transistors (p-type WSe2 and n-type MoS2) integrated with an analog, nonvolatile, and programmable floating-gate memory stack to develop in-memory computing primitives necessary for energy- and area-efficient hardware acceleration of SA for Ising spin systems. Search acceleration of >800x is demonstrated for 4 x 4 ferromagnetic, antiferromagnetic, and spin glass systems using SA compared to an exhaustive search using a brute force trial at miniscule total energy expenditure of approximate to 120 nJ. The hardware-realistic numerical simulations further highlight the astounding benefits of SA in accelerating the search for larger spin lattices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据