4.7 Review

Polymers in pharmaceutical additive manufacturing: A balancing act between printability and product performance

期刊

ADVANCED DRUG DELIVERY REVIEWS
卷 177, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2021.113923

关键词

3D printing; Characterization; Oral drug delivery; Processability; Macromolecules; Excipients; Quality by design; Process analytical technology; Fused deposition modelling; Digitalization

资金

  1. NordForsk [85352]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article highlights the crucial role of polymeric materials in additive manufacturing of oral dosage forms and suggests ways to stimulate their use. By exploring polymer properties and new characterization techniques, it aims to facilitate the continued development of 3D printers for a wider variety of polymers in pharmaceutical additive manufacturing.
Materials and manufacturing processes share a common purpose of enabling the pharmaceutical product to perform as intended. This review on the role of polymeric materials in additive manufacturing of oral dosage forms, focuses on the interface between the polymer and key stages of the additive manufacturing process, which determine printability. By systematically clarifying and comparing polymer functional roles and properties for a variety of AM technologies, together with current and emerging techniques to characterize these properties, suggestions are provided to stimulate the use of readily available and sometimes underutilized pharmaceutical polymers in additive manufacturing. We point to emerging characterization techniques and digital tools, which can be harnessed to manage existing trade-offs between the role of polymers in printer compatibility versus product performance. In a rapidly evolving technological space, this serves to trigger the continued development of 3D printers to suit a broader variety of polymers for widespread applications of pharmaceutical additive manufacturing. (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据