4.5 Article

The Anopheles baileyi species complex (Diptera: Culicidae: Anophelinae) in Bhutan

期刊

ACTA TROPICA
卷 226, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2021.106241

关键词

bhutanensis n; sp; Mosquito; monticola n; Systematics; Taxonomy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper examines three species (informally referred to as species A, B, and C) of the Baileyi Complex within the Anopheles subgenus Anopheles. Species A is identified as An. baileyi, while species B and C are newly described and named as An. monticola and An. bhutanensis, respectively. The study provides a comparison of the morphological characteristics of the adults, male genitalia, larvae, pupae, and chaetotaxy of the immature stages of these species with An. baileyi from Bhutan. It reveals significant differences in the structures of the male genitalia and larval setae development among the three species.
This paper deals with three species (informal species A, B and C) of the Baileyi Complex of Anopheles subgenus Anopheles (Diptera: Culicidae) that were recently reported from Bhutan. Species A is An. baileyi sensu stricto, while species B and C are new species which are formally described and named herein as An. monticola Somboon, Namgay & Harbach and An. bhutanensis Somboon, Namgay & Harbach, respectively. Morphological characters of the adults, male genitalia, larval and pupal stages of the two new species, and the chaetotaxy of the immature stages, are provided and compared with An. baileyi from Bhutan. Although the patterns of wing spots of the adults and the pupal setae of the three species are very similar, significant differences in structures of the male genitalia distinguish them. Larvae of An. baileyi and An. monticola are similar, but differ from the larva of An. bhutanensis in the development of setae 3-and 13-T. The first antennal flagellomere of females of An. baileyi and An. bhutanensis has a distinct patch of pale scales, which is absent in An. monticola.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据