4.5 Article

Ankle fractures in Finland: 118,929 operatively treated between 1987 and 2019

期刊

ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA
卷 93, 期 -, 页码 327-333

出版社

Medical Journal Sweden AB
DOI: 10.2340/17453674.2022.2071

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzed the inpatient data of operatively treated ankle fractures over a 33-year period in Finland and found that the number of operatively treated ankle fractures has leveled off, but now more difficult surgeries are being performed in elderly patients.
Background and purpose - Ankle fractures are one of the most common fractures requiring operative treatment. They occur most commonly in postmenopausal women and younger men and recent studies suggest that the incidence of ankle fractures is increasing. In this registry study, we analyze inpatient data of operatively treated ankle fractures during a period of 33 years from our comprehensive nationwide register data. Patients and methods - The data on operatively treated ankle fracture patients between January 1, 1987 and December 31, 2019 was collected from the Finnish National Hospital Discharge Register and analyzed. Results - 118,929 ankle fractures were treated operatively. These included lateral malleolar fractures (33%), bi- or trimalleolar fractures (51%), medial malleolar fractures (7%), and other fractures (9%). Mean age was 53 (SD 17) years for women and 43 (16) for men. The average annual incidence rate was 69 per 100,000 person-years. Over the past 3 decades incidence has leveled off for women and has started to decline for men. However, the incidence is increasing in the elderly women group (over 70 years of age). In the over 50 age group, comorbidities have increased over the years, being more common in men than in women. The incidence of ankle fractures was higher during the winter months (November-March). Interpretation - The number of operatively treated ankle fractures has leveled off during the last 33 years. However, nowadays we operate on more difficult fractures in elderly patients with comorbidities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据