4.5 Article

On finite element implementation of cyclic elastoplasticity: theory, coding, and exemplary problems

期刊

ACTA MECHANICA
卷 233, 期 1, 页码 83-120

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00707-021-03069-3

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCN [2019/35/B/ST8/03151]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work discusses the finite element implementation of small strain cyclic plasticity, considering elastoplastic constitutive models and utilizing the radial return mapping algorithm to discretize the constitutive equation. A relation for the consistent elastoplastic tangent operator is derived and a user subroutine is developed to implement the cyclic plasticity model. Several validation tests have been performed to verify the code's performance.
In this work the finite element (FE) implementation of the small strain cyclic plasticity is discussed. The family of elastoplastic constitutive models is considered which uses the mixed, kinematic-isotropic hardening rule. It is assumed that the kinematic hardening is governed by the Armstrong-Frederick law. The radial return mapping algorithm is utilized to discretize the general form of the constitutive equation. A relation for the consistent elastoplastic tangent operator is derived. To the best of the author's knowledge, this formula has not been presented in the literature yet. The obtained set of equations can be used to implement the cyclic plasticity models into numerous commercial or non-commercial FE packages. A user subroutine UMAT (User's MATerial) has been developed in order to implement the cyclic plasticity model by Yoshida into the open-source FE program CalculiX. The coding is included in the Appendix. It can be easily modified to implement any isotropic hardening rule for which the yield stress is a function of the effective plastic strain. The number of the utilized backstress variables can be easily increased as well. Several validation tests which have been performed in order to verify the code's performance are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据