4.7 Article

Multiple coupling modes to relax shear strain during grain boundary migration

期刊

ACTA MATERIALIA
卷 218, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2021.117222

关键词

Disconnection and dislocation; Grain boundaries; Vacancies; Plastic deformation; Molecular dynamics

资金

  1. CALMIP [2012-12172]
  2. [ANR-17-CE08-0007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a systematic investigation of coupling modes in grain boundary migration was conducted with molecular dynamics simulations. Multiple coupling modes and associated disconnections were identified, indicating that grain boundary migration may occur through the successive occurrence of two modes.
Shear-coupled grain boundary (GB) migration is an effective plastic mechanism in absence of dislocation activity, ie. more favorably in nanocrystalline metals. For a given GB, several stress induced migration mechanisms, referred as coupling modes participate to the decrease of the elastic energy produced by the shear. They operate through the nucleation and motion of interfacial defects known as disconnections, carrying elementary shear strain characterized by their Burgers vector. However, so far, the coupling modes have been studied only under a simple shear, a situation much less complex than expected in a strained polycrystal, where multiple components of the stress tensor are present. Here we propose a more systematic investigation of the coupling modes when a composite shear is applied. This promotes the activation of new coupling modes. Using Molecular Dynamics simulations, we evidence these multiple coupling modes and the operation of their associate disconnections. Moreover, we also show that, even at low temperature, GB migration may occur by the successive occurrence of two modes: the relaxed shear appears then as an effective parameter, resulting from the combination of two operating elementary mechanisms. (c) 2021 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据