4.2 Article

Exposure to aluminium chloride during the peripuberal period induces prostate damage in male rats

期刊

ACTA HISTOCHEMICA
卷 124, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.acthis.2022.151843

关键词

Aluminium chloride; Ventral prostate; Inflammation; Testosterone

资金

  1. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) Brazil [406189/2016-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study suggests that exposure to aluminium chloride during the peripubertal period can have detrimental effects on prostate development in rats, including decreased body weight and reorganization of tissue compartments.
Aluminium (Al) is an important metal, but it can be toxic including for prostate tissue. This study aimed to evaluate whether exposure to aluminium chloride (AlCl3) during the peripubertal period affects ventral prostate development in rats. Male Wistar rats (30 days old) were distributed into three experimental groups: control (sterile 0.9% saline solution), AL7 (7 mg AlCl3/kg) and AL34 (34 mg AlCl3/kg). Animals were treated intra-peritoneally from postnatal day (PND) 36-66 (peripubertal period). At PND67, the animals were anaesthetized and euthanized. Blood was collected for testosterone levels. The ventral prostate (VP) was removed, weighed and processed for histochemistry and immunohistochemistry to detect androgen (AR) and Ki67. Stereological and histopathological analyses, mast cell counts, and determinations of myeloperoxidase (MPO) and N-acetyl glycosidase (NAG) activity and IL-6 levels were performed. The AL34 group presented a reduction in body weight and increase in MPO activity compared to the other groups. In both the AL7 and AL34 groups, there was reorganization of the prostatic tissue compartments. There was no significant difference in prostate weight, number of granulated or degranulated mast cells, or testosterone levels. In conclusion, the exposure to aluminium chloride during the peripubertal period impairs the prostatic development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据