4.0 Article

Is distyly in subtropical Psychotria brachyceras (Rubiaceae) similar to the general trends observed for the genus?

期刊

ACTA BOTANICA BRASILICA
卷 35, 期 4, 页码 627-637

出版社

SOC BOTANICA BRASIL
DOI: 10.1590/0102-33062020abb0058

关键词

heterostyly; pollen tube growth; pollination; reproductive biology; self-incompatibility

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Distyly is a floral polymorphism that promotes cross-pollination, and Psychotria brachyceras belongs to a population of Distylous Rubiaceae. The population exhibits typical Distyly characteristics, with high reciprocity, evenly distributed inaccuracy values between sexual organs, and a functional heteromorphic incompatibility system.
Distyly is a floral polymorphism that promotes cross-pollination through precise pollination. Psychotria is a mostly tropical genus of distylous Rubiaceae. Although widely studied in Brazil, some regions/species are still poorly explored, which hinders the understanding of distyly system along a greater geographical range. Here, we studied a subtropical population of Psychotria brachyceras in southern Brazil. For this, we characterized morphs occurrence, reciprocity of sexual structures, mating and incompatibility systems. In addition, we compared the reciprocity values from other species of the genus based on values gathered from literature to understand how the population behaves. The population showed equal proportions of thrum (short stigma/high anthers) and pin (high stigma/short anthers) morphs. Reciprocity was higher than the average for the genus and inaccuracy values between sexual organs were evenly distributed between the organ types, indicating a trend to typical distyly. Higher fruit set rates in intermorph and open pollination treatments and pollen tube growth observations confirmed that the population has a functional heteromorphic incompatibility system. Psychotria brachyceras showed no signs of distinct traits to typical distylous populations, which seems to ensure reproductive success and distyly maintenance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据