4.8 Article

Phosphorescent Carbon-Nanodots-Assisted Forster Resonant Energy Transfer for Achieving Red Afterglow in an Aqueous Solution

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 15, 期 10, 页码 16242-16254

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.1c05234

关键词

carbon nanodots; phosphorescence; red afterglow; Forster resonant energy transfer; bioimaging

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11904326, 62075198]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019TQ0287, 2019M662510]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Water-soluble red afterglow imaging agents based on ecofriendly nanomaterials have been developed, utilizing CNDs and RhB to create a CNDs-RhB@silica nanocomposite, achieving efficient energy transfer and the best red afterglow performance.
Water-soluble red afterglow imaging agents based on ecofriendly nanomaterials have potential application in time-gated afterglow bioimaging due to their larger penetration depth and nondurable excitation. Herein, red afterglow imaging agents consisted of Rhodamine B (RhB) and carbon nanodots (CNDs) have been designed and demonstrated. In these agents, CNDs act as energy donors, and RhB acts as an energy acceptor. Both of them are confined into a hydrophilic silica shell to form a CNDs-RhB@silica nanocomposite. The phosphorescence emission spectrum of the CNDs and the absorption spectrum of the RhB match well, and efficient energy transfer from the CNDs to the RhB via Forster resonant energy transfer process can be achieved, with a transfer efficiency can reach 99.2%. Thus, the as-prepared nanocomposite can emit a red afterglow in aqueous solution, and the afterglow spectrum of CNDs-RhB@silica nanocomposite can extend to the first near-infrared window (NIR-I). The luminescence lifetime and afterglow quantum yield (QY) of the CNDs-RhB@silica can reach 0.91 s and 3.56%, respectively, which are the best results in red afterglow region. Time-gated in vivo afterglow imaging has been demonstrated by using the CNDs-RhB@silica as afterglow agents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据