4.6 Article

High-Throughput Activity Assay for Screening Inhibitors of the SARS-CoV-2 Mac1 Macrodomain

期刊

ACS CHEMICAL BIOLOGY
卷 17, 期 1, 页码 17-23

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acschembio.1c00721

关键词

-

资金

  1. Johns Hopkins University
  2. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Development Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Viral macrodomains are crucial for virus replication and pathogenesis, making them a promising target for antiviral therapy. Dasatinib has been identified as a potential ADP-ribosylhydrolase inhibitor, showing effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV, but not affecting the closest human homologue MacroD2. This study demonstrates the feasibility of identifying selective inhibitors based on ADP-ribosylhydrolase activity and provides a potential avenue for developing better macrodomain inhibitors as antiviral therapies for SARS-CoV-2 and other viral threats.
Macrodomains are a class of conserved ADP-ribosylhydrolases expressed by viruses of pandemic concern, including coronaviruses and alphaviruses. Viral macrodomains are critical for replication and virus-induced pathogenesis; therefore, these enzymes are a promising target for antiviral therapy. However, no potent or selective viral macrodomain inhibitors currently exist, in part due to the lack of a high-throughput assay for this class of enzymes. Here we developed a high-throughput ADP-ribosylhydrolase assay using the SARS-CoV-2 macrodomain Mac1. We performed a pilot screen that identified dasatinib and dihydralazine as ADP-ribosylhydrolase inhibitors. Importantly, dasatinib inhibits SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV Mac1 but not the closest human homologue, MacroD2. Our study demonstrates the feasibility of identifying selective inhibitors based on ADP-ribosylhydrolase activity, paving the way for the screening of large compound libraries to identify improved macrodomain inhibitors and to explore their potential as antiviral therapies for SARS-CoV-2 and future viral threats.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据