4.8 Article

Concentrated Ethanol Electrosynthesis from CO2 via a Porous Hydrophobic Adlayer

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 14, 期 3, 页码 4155-4162

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.1c21386

关键词

carbon dioxide; reduction; electrocatalysis; ethanol; concentrated; hydrophobic; adlayer; porous

资金

  1. Suncor Energy Ltd
  2. National Research Council
  3. University of Toronto Collaboration Centre Program in Green Energy Materials (CC-GEM) [GEM-PRJ-01]
  4. Ontario Research Fund Research-Excellence Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electrochemical CO2 reduction can convert waste emissions into dense liquid fuels, but current methods result in low ethanol concentrations. This study presents a porous catalyst adlayer that reduces water transport and facilitates the evaporation of ethanol, leading to a recoverable stream of concentrated ethanol.
Electrochemical CO2 reduction can convert waste emissions into dense liquid fuels compatible with existing energy infrastructure. High-rate electrocatalytic conversion of CO2 to ethanol has been achieved in membrane electrode assembly (MEA) electrolyzers; however, ethanol produced at the cathode is transported, via electroosmotic drag and diffusion, to the anode, where it is diluted and may be oxidized. The ethanol concentrations that result on both the cathodic and anodic sides are too low to justify the energetic and financial cost of downstream separation. Here, we present a porous catalyst adlayer that facilitates the evaporation of ethanol into the cathode gas stream and reduces the water transport, leading to a recoverable stream of concentrated ethanol. The adlayer is comprised of ethylcellulose-bonded carbon nanoparticles and forms a porous, electrically conductive network on the surface of the copper catalyst that slows the transport of water to the gas channel. We achieve the direct production of an ethanol stream of 12.4 wt %, competitive with the concentration of current industrial ethanol production processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据