4.8 Article

Stabilizing Li Anodes in I2 Steam to Tackle the Shuttling-Induced Depletion of an Iodide/Triiodide Redox Mediator in Li-O2 Batteries with Suppressed Li Dendrite Growth

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 13, 期 45, 页码 53859-53867

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.1c15349

关键词

Li-O-2 battery; charge overpotential; shuttle effect; redox mediators; Li dendrites; protective layer

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51802152]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu for Outstanding Youth Fund [BK20211590]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By creating a LiI protective layer on the Li metal anode, this study effectively suppressed dendrite growth, resulting in improved charging voltage stability and cycle life of the Li-O-2 battery.
Redox mediators (RMs) have become a significant point in the now-established Li-O-2 battery system to reduce the charging overpotential in the oxygen evolution process. Nevertheless, a major inherent barrier of the RM is the redox shuttling between the Li metal anode and mobile RM, resulting in the corrosion of Li and depletion of RM. In this study, taking iodide/triiodide as a model RM, we propose an effective strategy by immersing the Li metal anode in I-2 steam to create a 1.5 mu m thick surface protective layer. The resultant ionic conductive LiI layer on the Li metal anode can not only suppress Li dendrite growth but also act as a buffer layer between the RM and bare Li. By combining the iodide/triiodide RM with the LiI protective layer, the Li-O-2 battery shows low and steady charge voltage plateaus of similar to 3.6 V over 70 cycles. Importantly, the symmetrical cell using the LiI-protected Li electrode exhibited small Li plating/stripping overpotentials (similar to 20 mV, 480 h), far superior to that of the bare Li electrode (similar to 70 mV, 300 h). The in situ interfacial observation shows that dendrite growth on the Li metal can be effectively suppressed by optimizing the LiI protective layer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据